Untitled Document

Forwarded to: TWIMC & served in order to file a PUBLIC INFORMATION against the Federal Crown

The Office of the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General, and the Solicitor General of Alberta
IN ORDER to deliver /support a charge of FAILURE OF AN ENTITY TO COMPLY, under the Police Act 1998
Committed by the Office of the Federal Crown, who refuse to be responsible for holding the file # 1-19621
Yet refuse to drop the charges or communicate with the defendant and in so doing violating Sec 336 CCC /Sec 337 CCC, by using Sec 19 CCC as an excuse, in order to uphold tyranny itself, under Sec 15 CCC,

PREAMBLE This charge, and the Crown’s response is God-sent, on the solid ground that it proves TYRANNY
There is absolutely no ground to proceed and it's a true litmus test of whether what’s happening in BC is systemic

BASIC CHARGES:- charged April 1st, 2008 – by 4 rogue police Officers working outside the rule of law of Canada
1] 1-count of possession for the purposes of trafficking [PPT] of less than one ounce of personal medicine.
2] 1-count of possession [only] of what they called cannabis resin, which were actually home-made cookies..
3] 1-count of possession of over $5,000 [s-354], which I must now prove was not gotten as the proceeds of crime,

EVENTS LEADING UP TO THE CHARGES: I needed to go to Ontario, after having been raped by BC provincial court on May 29th in order to face the Registrar of Ontario, so I took all my necessary documentation on my IDENTITY issue, and brought about 30 lbs of 'political literature' that promoted compassion clubs across Canada.
1] I bought a 1-month bus pass, I had 2 pieces of carry-on luggage - a small back pack and a small gym bag
2] I got off in Golden for breakfast and the bus left without me, which meant having to wait for the next bus to Calgary that came about 10 hours later, so I arranged to have my bags dropped /picked-up in Calgary.
3] When I got to Calgary Greyhound Station I was escorted into the Security Office & charged

FROM THIS POINT ON THERE IS TOTAL TYRANNY- [Systemic lawlessness by police, supported by the Crown]
- in order "to enforce all laws not yet passed" - [Central Scrutinizer] Frank Zappa 1979, which is a dire warning of the negative effects of COPYRIGHT, which is the very premise of my defense that: The only form that appears to be used to enforce my prosecution(s) are the prerequisites necessary to be compliant with the Contraventions Act,
- Police are using this Act as if it was passed in law, yet it’s being enforced under [foreign] maritime jurisdiction in a
direct violation of Constitutional safeguards that are there for the function of barring [precluding] this very activity

1] At my arrest, there are 4 Officers; not one of them has a name or badge # and they tell me they don't need to give that information. I make it clear that without an IDENTITY, they are contract police acting ‘outside Canada’
- They hand me a 1-page pre-written file no./ticket 345365, and I'm told that a dog smelled pot in my luggage,
- Badge # 45348 tells me his # is arresting me, but he refuses to prove it’s him, or sign it before me
- This ticket only had a monogram, and a charge form holds an Officer responsible for false arrest, by signing it.

2] They now tell me that they are not going to bring me in for identification finger-printing and/or standard booking procedure - Now, with this news, I want to go to jail, because they refused to give me a receipt for the money they were confiscating; Because, if they booked me they would give the money to Sheriffs, who would then release me with my money, at a Show Cause Hearing: Therefore, I’m being denied due process, and I called them on it!
This bozo cop actually asked [with sincerity] "What's the matter, don't you trust us?"

3] They admit to having read my IDENTITY ISSUE documentation and use Sec19 CCC as an excuse; they admit that under "The Identification of Criminals Act" that jurisdiction to charge me was questionable, So, I sign this ‘ticket’ "under duress of enslavement", and they object to this, so I tell them to bring me to jail, which they refused to do. From the very beginning, due to procedure and jurisdiction, they have no ground to proceed

4] The next day, I filed a complaint in person at the Vancouver at RCMP E-Division - They said that this action was taken by what is now called: RCMP C-Division & it's the new Headquarters for CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT & the home of a ‘perversion of law’ called Part-9 of the 1998 Police Act, where it’s undeniable that Authority has crossed an ethical line, where omission is not just legally wrong, but also morally unconscionable - [under Sec 16 CCC]

- Now this 'new' RCMP - C Division does not have a listed phone number, & in fact RCMP Edmonton or Vancouver Offices could not find their # either. Their old downtown detachment number has been abandoned…
- In law, our Charter of Rights [Sec 20] says it's against the law for any government agency to have an unlisted number, by the fact that we must be able to communicate with the head of any Canadian agency Therefore 'undeniably' that means that this RCMP C-Division is acting "outside Canada" [a legal term]
- They are in charge of border and transportation security and that's now under NATO control, under CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT which has the exact opposite function of civilians overseeing ‘accountable’ police
- My ticket # 345365 says the RCMP are @ 7575 8th St NE Calgary, and had I not gone there myself,
- I would have never known this because it's simply not listed in public record that I can find...
- [I'm not kidding you, when I say THAT] When I went there, the morning after my charges, and started asking questions, a security guard told me to go away or else they would call the police, and
Then forced me out of the building when I laughed at him, saying 'please do; you're the criminals'

5] In law, this entire division of the RCMP 'swear allegiance' to NATO, and therefore can be like a security guard for their boss who holds jurisdiction over the border and transportation stations, [apparently bus stations- are now 'maritime jurisdiction'], but under the Contraventions Act, they can write a ticket and ignore all Constitutional rights.
Imagine that! History is repeating itself: the Gestapo/SS were also transportation police, working 'outside' Germany, under maritime jurisdiction. This RCMP Division has no constitutional right to write a real charge because they do not swear allegiance to the Queen. [unless you want SS police back again]

6] FURTHERMORE to add insult to injury, to the weakness of this case file - 3 weeks after they charge me the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that dog searches of luggage at this very bus station are unconstitutional...
- So, I call the Crown in order to see what they’re going to do about my case now, and nobody wants to talk to me. I get a short answer of "put it in writing", so I fax them a letter and again in total violation of Sec 20 Charter right, They refuse to forward any information verbally let alone in writing, other than they are not dropping the charges,

7] Since this April 30th filing: I get nothing but run-around of no accountability – from, first the Federal Crown, where there is no one responsible for holding my file, yet someone says the charges are not dropped, and some unaccountable person(s) refuse to forward my particulars to me, - After 2-weeks of obstruction at this Crown -
- I write a letter to the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General of Alberta, who refuse responsibility to intervene, and after following the advice of a sergeant of the Dep. Gen Office, I actually got the file number from BC Federal Crown and as to their Instructions, I again try to get compliance to the law from Alberta Federal Crown and as outlined in a recorded message, I hold them to be in contempt of FAILURE OF AN ENTITY TO COMPLY

8] I now return a call to the Alberta Attorney Generals’ Office, on May 29th, where I made a passionate plea that there was a crime committed in Alberta that has never been recognized in Canada, but defined in 18th century law as ‘judicial RAPE’, and that really only left me to seeking remedy under the Attorney Generals’ Office for this crime
In order to defend this charge I need to use Sec 8 (2) CCC, which is old English case law, which means addressing a court challenge on the deeper reason for enacting Big M Drug Mart [1985], in the first place.
This can only be done with a tribunal, and in so doing manifest Destiny by recognizing the new Covenant.

9] My unique position in law is that any Authority who challenges my lawful right to exist, [let alone be free] can…
But they will face the fate of having an Attorney General, a Deputy Attorney General and a Solicitor General face the unique opportunity of triggering Hebrews 10:28 “Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died a merciless death on the testimony of two or three witnesses”, and if it was not for the undeniable fact that I am delivering Jubilee and the new Covenant, then I’d call ‘everything’ that I’m attempting to deliver ‘frivolous and vexatious’, but it’s not.

10] Frankly, I enter this chaos with confidence; If it’s not this time, then it’s the next time. I am not picking the time of Jacob or Israel’s doom, God does that… But as sure a God made little green apples; I am delivering good tidings of Isaiah 40, and it’s not my choice as to what anyone chooses, but my advice is simply: follow the law for the law’s sake as in Romans 13, and we will trigger our entry to Paradise, with a glorious rapture [paradigm shift]
As I said in the beginning, this charge was a God-sent. It forces ‘a yes’ or ‘no’ options at every turn, and it must be said: ‘nonfeasance means compliance’ to the fact that you won’t know what you’ve got til it’s gone.
Jesus said: if it was up to him that he would have triggered the Creation; the messenger(s) can only make an offer the chosen must choose [Eccl 9] Who knows what awaits them, love or hate? They all share a common Destin